Crematorium Update - 28th February 2019
Since November 2018 when the planning permission was granted by Susan Kitchen, Corporate Planner AVDC, despite having received countless representations and expert evidence, all requests to meet to discuss us concerns have been refused. The Parish Council has attempted to get a meeting with planning officers, cabinet members and district councillors. Click here to view all correspondence sent since November 2018.
Crematorium Update - 23rd February 2019
Aylesbury Vale District Council’s Planning Department decided to approve Westerleigh’s application, albeit subject to a large number of conditions, despite our having presented hundreds of pages of factual documents with planning reasons to object, literally hundreds of letters of objection from parishioners and others, our QC’s Opinion, Legal Advice, Landscape Assessment, Sequential Test, Environmental reports, etc., containing sufficient reasons for them to refuse this planning application. All of this quite apart from the moral and other arguments about building a crematorium on designated leisure land in full view of the community.
To say we were shocked is an understatement. The PC and parishioners truly believed that AVDC would listen to us, particularly having won a quashing in the Court of Appeal. They have let our community down. The planning permission is subject to a large number of conditions, many of which the Parish Council and residents know cannot be met particularly those relating to Highways, landscape and environment, despite AVDC discharging them.
I regret to inform readers that despite our having written to AVDC more or less every day during past months since permission was granted in November, the District Council refused point-blank to meet us. They haven’t listened to our views, do not understand the issues fully and Officers, particularly within Highways have condemned us to what can only become traffic chaos.
Despite all our efforts, over four years, our community has been totally ignored. Sadly, this example of truly appalling planning means we will be condemned to have this facility in full view of homes and leisure facilities in the village, thanks to AVDC’s reluctance to listen. They could have stopped this early on, but our perception, from the start, was that nothing we said or did was going to make any difference. Shame on them.
I cannot tell you the depth of my personal disappointment, nor the huge debt of gratitude the parish owes to Noreen Shardlow, our Parish Clerk, Irina Schwab a Councillor and our solicitor, to our fellow Councillors who have stood firm throughout the extremely unpleasant experience including having applicants who threatened Councillors and put out constant messages in the press with misinformation about us.
We should have expected to be treated with the courtesy and respect we have displayed in connection with this matter, within the legal and planning processes. How sad that AVDC does not see us an elected Local Council in their District, and colleagues, but as an irritant standing in the way of their decided course of action. Watermead residents have similarly been treated with the same level of disdain.
At the time of writing there is still one Condition left to be discharged, the Environmental Management Plan.
The Environment Agency has now expressed the same concerns as the Parish Council. We advised that Condition 15 cannot be discharged, yet the Crematorium has opened. We have not given up and will continue to the end to fight this. However, without the support of District Councillors and the Planning Committee, this is very hard indeed. Please rest assured the Parish Council is doing its very best, but without any support from the Planning Department. We are in touch with Enforcement Officers and are meeting them next week. Whilst AVDC has chosen its course of action, the company has to comply with the EA requirements within 90 days of opening.
At the January Parish Council meeting, attended by Westerleigh representatives, parishioners expressed revulsion at the stark building and in particular the bridge and the open views from homes across the lake, and from our leisure land, into the chapel itself. The company's Ambassador subsequently visited homes across the lake and expressed the view that had the company visited and seen the site before it was developed they would not have built here. We have since been advised that this is not the company's view, but his own.
Parishioners attending the February PC meeting told us that the daily view of hearses, mourners, coffins and funeral proceedings is both out of keeping and unpleasant. It brings a stark reminder to those who have lost loved ones of that loss, on a daily basis. Feedback we have received to date shows that this is causing real harm. Some residents are discouraged from walking in that area, for so long a much-enjoyed and appreciated part of life in Watermead. For others, it is a matter of principal to walk there, despite the unpleasant surroundings. There is absolutely no respect shown to those who live here, nor to the thousands of people who enjoy our leisure land throughout the year.
This week's statements to the Bucks Herald newspaper by the manager, to the effect that the Parish Council had asked that screening and blinds be installed in the crematorium is incorrect. Two Councillors and the Parish Clerk visited Westerleigh at their head office outside Bristol, and met the Acting CEO and another Director on a separate issue. It was Westerleigh's choice to put in blinds, which still allow a view into the chapel and are indadequate. During our visit we stated that the only way to adequately hide the building is to surround it with high trees and hedging on all sides. There are few trees on site which results in an uninterrupted view of funerals from the main road, homes in Buckingham Park and by all visiting or leaving Watermead. If we must have this facility, It needs to be totally hidden from view for both our sakes and that of the bereaved.
Cllr Sue Severn - Chairman
Crematorium Update 23rd February 2019 Planning Permission Given 10th December 2018
Next steps for Watermead
Watermead Crematorium APP NO 14/01575/APP
THE DECISION
Since the Secretary of State chose not to 'call in' the application it was returned to AVDC in early November. The Parish Council has since personally contacted the Leader, Cabinet Member for Planning and every District Councillor, the Planning Manager and Officer, to make sure they understand the real concerns of the residents directly affected by this appalling planning decision.
We continue to seek an urgent meeting to set out, once again, the reasons why the Planning Conditions cannot be met and to urge the District Council to ensure they are not discharged.
We have met with little success, but continue to try our very best to ensure the views of residents are heard and understood.
To see the Planning Permission click here and the Conditions please click here
Please write personally to AVDC if you wish to make any representations, it is still important and worthwhile:
Email: devcon@aylesburyvaledc.gov.uk
Subject: Watermead Crematorium APP NO 14/01575/APP
NEXT STEPS
The PC has also written to the Secretary of State to protest at this Approval and to ask that the Conditions are reviewed by the Planning Inspectorate.
Thank you for your continued support. Please let us know if you need any help or if you have any questions. As we said, speed is essential. We hope that the Secretary of State will take notice of our concerns.
Kind regards,
Watermead Parish Council
01296 395211 or 336575
CREMATORIUM UPDATE 30th NOVEMBER 2018 COMMUNICATION SENT TO AVDC
Further to previous correspondence and to your request that we let you have information as soon as we are able, please note the following raised by our Counsel:
- The planning considerations have altered since the committee met. The VALP has now been through examination and has reached a more advanced stage, and the NPPF has been revised. We are advised that the revised Framework policy on design has been amended to place particular emphasis on the need for development to be visually attractive as a result of good architecture (para 127 b).
In contrast, the Officer's Report assesses design by reference to the former Framework and by reference to the saved policies of the local plan. The Officer assesses consistency of development plan policies by reference to the former Framework, not the revised Framework. This comparison and assessment of consistency should arguably, now be undertaken in respect of all the issues which are addressed in the April Officer's Report. This should be undertaken by the Council, by reference to the revised Framework and the emerging VALP. This is a key reason for the matter to be returned to Committee.
The building is out of keeping and overbearing intruding on valuable landscape.
- Last night the Applicants held an open evening for prospective customers despite the fact that they do not yet have planning permission, nor that many conditions have to be met before they can become operational. We remain most concerned given the way they operate. These concerns have been raised with you before. We do not have feel confident that we have any protection against the possibility that the crematorium will open without full planning consent and all conditions discharged.
- Conditions:
We have been advised that the Applicants have held talks with the Best Western Hotel next to the gym in Watermead in an attempt to meet the condition regarding alternative parking provision. We must point out, before the plan is even considered, that the gym car park (as advised in our submissions with photographic evidence) is always one of the first areas to flood within the flood plain, and that it can be unusable for weeks. Members of the gym already park in the hotel car park and on the road during periods of flood there would be no more spaces. Adding any further parking to this mix would result in traffic chaos and totally unacceptable inconvenience and stress for Watermead residents. In the event that planning permission is given, please ensure that this conditions is not discharged unless and until a proper, off-site, parking scheme is put into operation, as stated in the Application.
- Reference any amendments to planning conditions the conditions:
Those suggested by the Officer in his report are the minimum which could provide any protection for residents, particularly those in relation to operating hours, parking; landscaping etc.
- There is currently no provision for disabled visitors arriving without a vehicle, there is no pavement, merely a sign showing pedestrians walking in the road, this is unsafe. No Equality Impact Assessment has been included in the application.
We have received many further representations from parishioners. Please re-consider returning this Applicatoin to committee for consideration, given the above points, and others. To determine this application without public consideration of the issues, including further evidence, and in light of the changes detailed above can be considered undemocratic.
We understand and respect that the role of Planning Officers is to ensure that any planning decision is correct within strict planning and legal considerations. If you are comfortable with your recommendation, then returning it to committee for further debate could only serve to underline this.
If the committee is given the opportunity to re-consider, in public, with all representations fully considered and understood, our community will feel that the matter has been properly considered; we cannot understand the reason for refusing this request.
Kind regards,
Sue
Sue Severn
sue.severn@watermead-pc.gov.uk
CREMATORIUM UPDATE 24th November 2018
Since the Secretary of State returned the planning application to AVDC the Parish Council has been in constant touch with the council leader, chairman of strategic planning committee, local member and others to make the following points:
- The Secretary of State has returned the case to AVDC since it does not meet his criteria for call-in: Of national importance, a very large development. This is disappointing but he has not made any comment on the merits of the application, or of the community's case or objections.
- As soon as we received notification we sent a communication to the planning authority pointing out that there was new evidence, in the form of a detailed landscape survey, undertaken by a distinguished consultant who confirmed that Watermead does include attractive and important landscape and that this has not been considered in detail by the Officers or at the Strategic Planning Committee Meeting held in April 2018, at which members decided to accept the Officer's recommendation to approve, subject to a raft of conditions, and subject to the decision not being called in to the Secretary of State's Office.
- Watermead PC has, repeatedly, put forward evidence that many of the planning conditions cannot be met in our both submissions as consultees and in correspondence with officers and members. We have requested that enforcement action be taken against the applicants who built without benefit of legal planning permission and, following quashing of the planning permission in the Court of Appeal.
- There is real concern in our community that the crematorium will change our village and our lives forever, with no assistance given should the fears we have become reality:
Concerns such as increased flooding in Watermead;
Parking throughout the Watermead roads and constant funeral traffic;
No pedestrian route into the site;
The entrance is not wide enough to allow two funeral vehicles to pass one another, which will lead to congestion outside and lack of safe vision for those leaving the crematorium;
No alternative parking arrangements have been detailed by the applicants;
Planting is completely inadequate to hide the building and funerals;
Loss of our ability to enjoy our leisure land and all the activities enjoyed for many years, the crematorium will inhibit this enjoyment; residents do not wish to Constantly see funerals and traffic which will, naturally, have a depressing effect.
- To date, AVDC has neither properly considered our arguments and those of over 500 residents we asked that the matter be returned to committee for a fresh hearing, and decision.
The Parish Council was refused and then lobbied councillors and officers, eventually receiving support from one councillor who understood he could ask for the application to go back to committee, with the new landscape evidence. He was also refused point blank within hours.
Given the serious implications of this application approved parish councillors ask residents to now write, in numbers, to AVDC at the following addresses to ask for a committee to hear the application, and new evidence before any decision is made. We are able to send the emails to parishioners who wish to see them, please just email noreen.shardlow@watermead-pc.gov.uk who will send them to you. The Landscape Assessment is also on our website. If you wish to refresh your memory of the meeting we have links to both the public speaking and committee parts (4 hours plus) please ask for these.
None of our reasonable requests has received anything other than the email below the AVDC Corporate Planner. If you wish to write please contact Noreen Shardlow who will let you have the relevant email addresses.
Click here to view our Landscape Evidence File 1
Click here to view our Landscape Evidence File 2
12th November 2018 -
We have just received the disappointing news that the crematorium application will not be called in to the Secretary of State. An email has been sent to Aylesbury Vale District Council Planning Department advising that the Parish Council needs a short while to consider the position and requesting that the application is returned to a planning committee meeting with public representation. We will publish updates as they become available and after the parish councillors have met. Click here to read the Secretary of State decision letter
Since November 2018 when the planning permission was granted by Susan Kitchen, Corporate Planner AVDC, despite having received countless representations and expert evidence, all requests to meet to discuss us concerns have been refused. The Parish Council has attempted to get a meeting with planning officers, cabinet members and district councillors. Click here to view all correspondence sent since November 2018.
Crematorium Update - 23rd February 2019
Aylesbury Vale District Council’s Planning Department decided to approve Westerleigh’s application, albeit subject to a large number of conditions, despite our having presented hundreds of pages of factual documents with planning reasons to object, literally hundreds of letters of objection from parishioners and others, our QC’s Opinion, Legal Advice, Landscape Assessment, Sequential Test, Environmental reports, etc., containing sufficient reasons for them to refuse this planning application. All of this quite apart from the moral and other arguments about building a crematorium on designated leisure land in full view of the community.
To say we were shocked is an understatement. The PC and parishioners truly believed that AVDC would listen to us, particularly having won a quashing in the Court of Appeal. They have let our community down. The planning permission is subject to a large number of conditions, many of which the Parish Council and residents know cannot be met particularly those relating to Highways, landscape and environment, despite AVDC discharging them.
I regret to inform readers that despite our having written to AVDC more or less every day during past months since permission was granted in November, the District Council refused point-blank to meet us. They haven’t listened to our views, do not understand the issues fully and Officers, particularly within Highways have condemned us to what can only become traffic chaos.
Despite all our efforts, over four years, our community has been totally ignored. Sadly, this example of truly appalling planning means we will be condemned to have this facility in full view of homes and leisure facilities in the village, thanks to AVDC’s reluctance to listen. They could have stopped this early on, but our perception, from the start, was that nothing we said or did was going to make any difference. Shame on them.
I cannot tell you the depth of my personal disappointment, nor the huge debt of gratitude the parish owes to Noreen Shardlow, our Parish Clerk, Irina Schwab a Councillor and our solicitor, to our fellow Councillors who have stood firm throughout the extremely unpleasant experience including having applicants who threatened Councillors and put out constant messages in the press with misinformation about us.
We should have expected to be treated with the courtesy and respect we have displayed in connection with this matter, within the legal and planning processes. How sad that AVDC does not see us an elected Local Council in their District, and colleagues, but as an irritant standing in the way of their decided course of action. Watermead residents have similarly been treated with the same level of disdain.
At the time of writing there is still one Condition left to be discharged, the Environmental Management Plan.
The Environment Agency has now expressed the same concerns as the Parish Council. We advised that Condition 15 cannot be discharged, yet the Crematorium has opened. We have not given up and will continue to the end to fight this. However, without the support of District Councillors and the Planning Committee, this is very hard indeed. Please rest assured the Parish Council is doing its very best, but without any support from the Planning Department. We are in touch with Enforcement Officers and are meeting them next week. Whilst AVDC has chosen its course of action, the company has to comply with the EA requirements within 90 days of opening.
At the January Parish Council meeting, attended by Westerleigh representatives, parishioners expressed revulsion at the stark building and in particular the bridge and the open views from homes across the lake, and from our leisure land, into the chapel itself. The company's Ambassador subsequently visited homes across the lake and expressed the view that had the company visited and seen the site before it was developed they would not have built here. We have since been advised that this is not the company's view, but his own.
Parishioners attending the February PC meeting told us that the daily view of hearses, mourners, coffins and funeral proceedings is both out of keeping and unpleasant. It brings a stark reminder to those who have lost loved ones of that loss, on a daily basis. Feedback we have received to date shows that this is causing real harm. Some residents are discouraged from walking in that area, for so long a much-enjoyed and appreciated part of life in Watermead. For others, it is a matter of principal to walk there, despite the unpleasant surroundings. There is absolutely no respect shown to those who live here, nor to the thousands of people who enjoy our leisure land throughout the year.
This week's statements to the Bucks Herald newspaper by the manager, to the effect that the Parish Council had asked that screening and blinds be installed in the crematorium is incorrect. Two Councillors and the Parish Clerk visited Westerleigh at their head office outside Bristol, and met the Acting CEO and another Director on a separate issue. It was Westerleigh's choice to put in blinds, which still allow a view into the chapel and are indadequate. During our visit we stated that the only way to adequately hide the building is to surround it with high trees and hedging on all sides. There are few trees on site which results in an uninterrupted view of funerals from the main road, homes in Buckingham Park and by all visiting or leaving Watermead. If we must have this facility, It needs to be totally hidden from view for both our sakes and that of the bereaved.
Cllr Sue Severn - Chairman
Crematorium Update 23rd February 2019 Planning Permission Given 10th December 2018
Next steps for Watermead
Watermead Crematorium APP NO 14/01575/APP
THE DECISION
Since the Secretary of State chose not to 'call in' the application it was returned to AVDC in early November. The Parish Council has since personally contacted the Leader, Cabinet Member for Planning and every District Councillor, the Planning Manager and Officer, to make sure they understand the real concerns of the residents directly affected by this appalling planning decision.
We continue to seek an urgent meeting to set out, once again, the reasons why the Planning Conditions cannot be met and to urge the District Council to ensure they are not discharged.
We have met with little success, but continue to try our very best to ensure the views of residents are heard and understood.
To see the Planning Permission click here and the Conditions please click here
Please write personally to AVDC if you wish to make any representations, it is still important and worthwhile:
Email: devcon@aylesburyvaledc.gov.uk
Subject: Watermead Crematorium APP NO 14/01575/APP
NEXT STEPS
The PC has also written to the Secretary of State to protest at this Approval and to ask that the Conditions are reviewed by the Planning Inspectorate.
Thank you for your continued support. Please let us know if you need any help or if you have any questions. As we said, speed is essential. We hope that the Secretary of State will take notice of our concerns.
Kind regards,
Watermead Parish Council
01296 395211 or 336575
CREMATORIUM UPDATE 30th NOVEMBER 2018 COMMUNICATION SENT TO AVDC
Further to previous correspondence and to your request that we let you have information as soon as we are able, please note the following raised by our Counsel:
- The planning considerations have altered since the committee met. The VALP has now been through examination and has reached a more advanced stage, and the NPPF has been revised. We are advised that the revised Framework policy on design has been amended to place particular emphasis on the need for development to be visually attractive as a result of good architecture (para 127 b).
In contrast, the Officer's Report assesses design by reference to the former Framework and by reference to the saved policies of the local plan. The Officer assesses consistency of development plan policies by reference to the former Framework, not the revised Framework. This comparison and assessment of consistency should arguably, now be undertaken in respect of all the issues which are addressed in the April Officer's Report. This should be undertaken by the Council, by reference to the revised Framework and the emerging VALP. This is a key reason for the matter to be returned to Committee.
The building is out of keeping and overbearing intruding on valuable landscape.
- Last night the Applicants held an open evening for prospective customers despite the fact that they do not yet have planning permission, nor that many conditions have to be met before they can become operational. We remain most concerned given the way they operate. These concerns have been raised with you before. We do not have feel confident that we have any protection against the possibility that the crematorium will open without full planning consent and all conditions discharged.
- Conditions:
We have been advised that the Applicants have held talks with the Best Western Hotel next to the gym in Watermead in an attempt to meet the condition regarding alternative parking provision. We must point out, before the plan is even considered, that the gym car park (as advised in our submissions with photographic evidence) is always one of the first areas to flood within the flood plain, and that it can be unusable for weeks. Members of the gym already park in the hotel car park and on the road during periods of flood there would be no more spaces. Adding any further parking to this mix would result in traffic chaos and totally unacceptable inconvenience and stress for Watermead residents. In the event that planning permission is given, please ensure that this conditions is not discharged unless and until a proper, off-site, parking scheme is put into operation, as stated in the Application.
- Reference any amendments to planning conditions the conditions:
Those suggested by the Officer in his report are the minimum which could provide any protection for residents, particularly those in relation to operating hours, parking; landscaping etc.
- There is currently no provision for disabled visitors arriving without a vehicle, there is no pavement, merely a sign showing pedestrians walking in the road, this is unsafe. No Equality Impact Assessment has been included in the application.
We have received many further representations from parishioners. Please re-consider returning this Applicatoin to committee for consideration, given the above points, and others. To determine this application without public consideration of the issues, including further evidence, and in light of the changes detailed above can be considered undemocratic.
We understand and respect that the role of Planning Officers is to ensure that any planning decision is correct within strict planning and legal considerations. If you are comfortable with your recommendation, then returning it to committee for further debate could only serve to underline this.
If the committee is given the opportunity to re-consider, in public, with all representations fully considered and understood, our community will feel that the matter has been properly considered; we cannot understand the reason for refusing this request.
Kind regards,
Sue
Sue Severn
sue.severn@watermead-pc.gov.uk
CREMATORIUM UPDATE 24th November 2018
Since the Secretary of State returned the planning application to AVDC the Parish Council has been in constant touch with the council leader, chairman of strategic planning committee, local member and others to make the following points:
- The Secretary of State has returned the case to AVDC since it does not meet his criteria for call-in: Of national importance, a very large development. This is disappointing but he has not made any comment on the merits of the application, or of the community's case or objections.
- As soon as we received notification we sent a communication to the planning authority pointing out that there was new evidence, in the form of a detailed landscape survey, undertaken by a distinguished consultant who confirmed that Watermead does include attractive and important landscape and that this has not been considered in detail by the Officers or at the Strategic Planning Committee Meeting held in April 2018, at which members decided to accept the Officer's recommendation to approve, subject to a raft of conditions, and subject to the decision not being called in to the Secretary of State's Office.
- Watermead PC has, repeatedly, put forward evidence that many of the planning conditions cannot be met in our both submissions as consultees and in correspondence with officers and members. We have requested that enforcement action be taken against the applicants who built without benefit of legal planning permission and, following quashing of the planning permission in the Court of Appeal.
- There is real concern in our community that the crematorium will change our village and our lives forever, with no assistance given should the fears we have become reality:
Concerns such as increased flooding in Watermead;
Parking throughout the Watermead roads and constant funeral traffic;
No pedestrian route into the site;
The entrance is not wide enough to allow two funeral vehicles to pass one another, which will lead to congestion outside and lack of safe vision for those leaving the crematorium;
No alternative parking arrangements have been detailed by the applicants;
Planting is completely inadequate to hide the building and funerals;
Loss of our ability to enjoy our leisure land and all the activities enjoyed for many years, the crematorium will inhibit this enjoyment; residents do not wish to Constantly see funerals and traffic which will, naturally, have a depressing effect.
- To date, AVDC has neither properly considered our arguments and those of over 500 residents we asked that the matter be returned to committee for a fresh hearing, and decision.
The Parish Council was refused and then lobbied councillors and officers, eventually receiving support from one councillor who understood he could ask for the application to go back to committee, with the new landscape evidence. He was also refused point blank within hours.
Given the serious implications of this application approved parish councillors ask residents to now write, in numbers, to AVDC at the following addresses to ask for a committee to hear the application, and new evidence before any decision is made. We are able to send the emails to parishioners who wish to see them, please just email noreen.shardlow@watermead-pc.gov.uk who will send them to you. The Landscape Assessment is also on our website. If you wish to refresh your memory of the meeting we have links to both the public speaking and committee parts (4 hours plus) please ask for these.
None of our reasonable requests has received anything other than the email below the AVDC Corporate Planner. If you wish to write please contact Noreen Shardlow who will let you have the relevant email addresses.
Click here to view our Landscape Evidence File 1
Click here to view our Landscape Evidence File 2
12th November 2018 -
We have just received the disappointing news that the crematorium application will not be called in to the Secretary of State. An email has been sent to Aylesbury Vale District Council Planning Department advising that the Parish Council needs a short while to consider the position and requesting that the application is returned to a planning committee meeting with public representation. We will publish updates as they become available and after the parish councillors have met. Click here to read the Secretary of State decision letter
CREMATORIUM UPDATE 26TH APRIL 2018
|
27th JUNE 2018 - 17/00771/APP Watermead Village Car Park To view Watermead Parish Council's latest submission/response to Planning Application 17/00771/APP please click here 31st May 2018 PLANNING APPLICATION CONSULTATION REOPENED 17/00771/APP Watermead Village Car Park, 21 flats The Parish Council has today received confirmation that the consultation period for the above application has opened, giving 21 days to respond One new document has been added to the Aylesbury Vale Planning Portal in connection with this planning application. ALL EXISTING COMMENTS AND OBJECTIONS WILL STAND AND BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN DETERMINING THE APPLICATION. IF YOUR OBJECTION HAS NOT ALTERED IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO RE-SEND. The Parish Council meets on 21st June 2018 and this application will be on the agenda now that we have been formally consutled. The existing PC objections also stand. NEXT STEPS We will be taking advice to ensure that any new information in the fresh submitted document is carefully considered, and a reasoned response, based on planning law, is made. If you have any questions, or would like any assistance in connection with this application, please call 01296 395211. Kind regards, Watermead Parish Councillors |
The Natural Beauty of Watermead
by Colin Baker
Filming and music rights Colin Baker
by Colin Baker
Filming and music rights Colin Baker
Why we are fighting to save our environment
A first report this morning of a cuckoo heard in our nature reserve.
Chicks enjoying the lake
Photograph: Eric Rose
Photograph: Eric Rose